Betting News

UKGC directs online operator Gamesys to pay £6 million over AML and social responsibility failures

The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has directed gaming operator Gamesys to pay a £6 million ($7,636,350) penalty after the Commission investigation revealed social responsibility and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) failings, and breaches that occurred between November 2021 and July 2022.

The Commission noted that Gamesys – which operates 16 websites including ballycasino.co.uk, doublebubblebingo.com, jackpotjoy.com, and megawayscasino.com – will also have to undergo a third-party audit to ensure it is effectively implementing its anti-money laundering and safer gambling policies, procedures and controls.

Kay Roberts, Executive Director of Operations, said: “Our focus as a regulator is to ensure that operators are employing policies and procedures which make gambling fair, safe and crime-free. We take this responsibility extremely seriously and whenever we find failures in policies and procedures then the business can expect significant regulatory action.”

The Commission announced that failures were revealed during a compliance assessment in May 2022.

The social responsibility failures of Gamesys included:

The commission said that Gamesys did not always identify customers at risk of experiencing harms associated with gambling. This was done by evading the following responsibilitites: 

The examples social responsibility failures, as stated by the Commission include:

According to the Commission, following were Gamesys Anti-money laundering failures

In certain circumstances, some customers were able to evade some of the licensee’s AML triggers/thresholds and go on to spend significant sums without AML checks being conducted – one customer deposited £14,585 in 28 weeks, another deposited £18,884 ($24,037)in just over six months and another deposited £34,280 ($43,635) in five and a half months.

Conducting inadequate customer due diligence and being over-reliant on third-party information (such as internet research) or the customer’s verbal assurances for a number of customers, including one who deposited over £25,000($31,807) in three months, another who deposited over £58,000 in six months, and another who deposited over £65,000 ($82,699) in six months. 

Having a ‘Reinvestment of winnings policy’ which was insufficient to mitigate the risk that deposited funds could be from illegitimate sources and not just from previous winnings.

Exit mobile version